Have you noticed that sometimes in scientific texts the information is presented with some degree of uncertainty, like the predictions of a horoscope? If you think about it, then the definition of science is somewhat vague. Wikipedia describes science as “a field of human activity aimed at developing and systematizing objective knowledge of reality”. This sounds true, but the 100% credibility of science is not confirmed by this definition. In this sense, you should trust the experience more. As experience is a combination of practically acquired knowledge and skills, that is what we learn in practice. Whereas science is designed to process such knowledge, putting forward theories that are not always able to answer the right questions.
Science often offers solutions that it cannot confirm.
One scientist once comically commented on the question about science asked at the conference: “As you know, there are two inevitable things in the world: death and taxes. It’s a delusion. There are actually three: death, taxes, and the fact that science is changing. ”
For everyone who provides a scientific argument, there is one who calls the counter argument. The problem of science in its variability. Any discovery is made on the basis of available data. But the limitations of these data allow us to judge the lack of objectivity of science. Today there is one theory, but tomorrow new information appears empirically. As a result, another theory is born that devalues the old one. Once it was science that asserted that the earth was flat and that the sun revolves around it. And a hundred years ago, people used heroin as a fight against cocaine addiction, until they found even more destructive properties of the first.
In addition, the theoretical nature of science allows many popularizers of pseudoscience with their strange versions to be born. You probably heard more than once these stories about the alien nature of the Egyptian pyramids or about the existence of underwater civilizations. Some areas of pseudoscience went far beyond scientific trolling and took shape in whole professional areas. Palmistry, homeopathy, NLP and many other areas with dubious theories already have their own army of followers.
Pseudoscience: now in your home
Strong faith in science prevents live
Strong faith in science sometimes leaves no choice for understanding important things. Even worse: it destroys any desire to understand them. In this sense, the “scientific” consciousness, contrary to expectations, is not capable of learning, but, on the contrary, it has become ossified within the framework of the stated theses. The person follows them, not wanting to figure out the issue on their own. There are many things that need a practical approach to fully understand. Imagine you never tried pineapple. You can talk as much as you want about its rich and sweet taste, but unless you try it personally, you cannot understand it. Dry scientific statistics confidently makes some predictions, but it is faith in yourself that can refute them. How, for example, the recovery of people with complex diseases, when doctors have already predicted death.
In this case, the film “Forrest Gump” is recalled, where the protagonist was weak-minded and did not pay attention to the well-established rules of life, ignoring universal human prejudices. Therefore, he was not afraid to take risks and try everything that fate presented to him. In the end, it made him rich. It may be a metaphor, but it eloquently demonstrates the essence of life.
Experience is the source of truth
Often science is food for the pseudo-intellect and supplier of truth for people who want to seem smarter than they really are. Appealing to facts, the meaning of which they do not always understand, these people ignore the value of experience as the most reliable source of knowledge. Science cannot give concrete answers to many vital questions. In order to achieve a clear understanding of the essence of things, it is necessary to get in touch with them in practice, to work, to make mistakes – in general, to do everything that makes you dive under the surface layer of the theory. That is how true knowledge can be gained. And if you need to get an answer from the side, then only the one who has studied the subject by experience can give it. Accordingly, the whole scientific approach should be based on two things: comprehending the practice and analyzing information from those who have passed this practice. In other cases, you only have guesses. Open your life: only it can teach those lessons to which science is powerless.